Knowledge Base Sections ▾
Navigation
▸ Start here By rolesCategories
For Investors 12
Glossary 12 - Where does GNK token value come from
- Gonka vs Competitors: Render, Akash, io.net
- The Libermans: from biophysics to decentralized AI
- GNK Tokenomics
- Risks and Prospects of Gonka: Objective Analysis
- Gonka vs Render Network: Detailed Comparison
- Gonka vs Akash: AI Inference vs Containers
- Gonka vs io.net: Inference vs GPU Marketplace
- Gonka vs Bittensor: A Detailed Comparison of Two Approaches to AI
- Gonka vs Flux: Two Approaches to Useful Mining
- Governance in Gonka: How a Decentralized Network is Managed
- How to buy GNK token: step-by-step guide
Investments
Gonka vs io.net: Inference vs GPU Marketplace
io.net is positioned as a “decentralized GPU network for AI.” It sounds similar to Gonka — but behind the similar description lie fundamentally different architectures. Gonka is a network with consensus, io.net is a marketplace. Let's look at the difference.
What io.net Does
io.net is a GPU aggregator from various sources: data centers, cloud providers, individual owners. Essentially, it's a marketplace for computing power: you rent GPU-hours for your tasks — model training, inference, rendering. io.net does not perform computations itself — it provides infrastructure and connects buyers with sellers of GPU resources.
Key Difference: Intermediary vs Network
io.net is an intermediary between GPU owners and consumers. You rent a cluster, configure it for your tasks, and are responsible for the result yourself. Gonka is a network with its own blockchain consensus Sprint, where AI inference is part of the protocol. You don't “rent a GPU” — you send a request via API, and the network processes it automatically, verifies the result via PoC V2, and distributes rewards to hosts.
Computation Verification
The main difference is computation verification:
| Parameter | Gonka | io.net |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Blockchain network with consensus | GPU marketplace |
| Verification | PoC V2 (automatic) | None built-in |
| AI inference | Built into protocol | Tenant-side |
| API | OpenAI-compatible | Cluster access |
| Cost | $0.003/1M tokens | Hourly per GPU |
| Security | BLS signatures, <10ms | Trust in operator |
Control vs Freedom: What to Choose
io.net provides control: you rent specific GPUs, configure the environment, and run arbitrary code. This is flexible but requires expertise. Gonka provides simplicity: OpenAI-compatible API, automatic routing, built-in verification. The cost of inference via Gonka is about $0.003/1M tokens. For AI inference, Gonka is more convenient and cheaper. For tasks requiring full environmental control (fine-tuning custom models, specific software), io.net is more flexible.
io.net is a GPU marketplace without built-in consensus and verification. Gonka is a network with PoW 2.0, where AI inference is part of the protocol. For AI requests, Gonka is simpler, cheaper, and more secure.